Latest Articles

2009-04-26

HOW OFTEN DO YOU GO TO CHURCH?

I came upon these interesting statistics while looking through the internet. It was posted as an article on the website of the Eldoraigne Family Church, a congregation of the Dutch Reformed Church in Pretoria.

They reported on research conducted by an organisation called NationMaster, looking into weekly church attendance. The question that was asked, is, "do you attend one or more church services per week?" It seems the question do not ask about religious affiliation, only general and organised religious attendance of the sorts. The link into each country on the site also contains interesting facts about religious trends about the specific country.

It makes interesting reading!

Rank





Countries



Amount
# 1





Nigeria:



89%
# 2





Ireland:



84%
# 3





Philippines:



68%
# 4





South Africa:



56%
# 5





Poland:



55%
# 6





Puerto Rico:



52%
= 7





Portugal:



47%
= 7





Slovakia:



47%
# 9





Mexico:



46%
# 10





Italy:



45%
= 11





United States:



44%
= 11





Belgium:



44%
= 13





Peru:



43%
= 13





Turkey:



43%
# 15





India:



42%
# 16





Canada:



38%
# 17





Brazil:



36%
# 18





Netherlands:



35%
= 19





Uruguay:



31%
= 19





Venezuela:



31%
# 21





Austria:



30%
# 22





United Kingdom:



27%
= 23





Spain:



25%
= 23





Argentina:



25%
= 23





Chile:



25%
# 26





Croatia:



22%
= 27





Hungary:



21%
= 27





France:



21%
# 29





Romania:



20%
= 30





Switzerland:



16%
= 30





Australia:



16%
= 30





Lithuania:



16%
= 33





Czech Republic:



14%
= 33





Korea, South:



14%
# 35





Taiwan:



11%
= 36





Ukraine:



10%
= 36





Bulgaria:



10%
= 36





Moldova:



10%
= 36





Georgia:



10%
# 40





China:



9%
# 41





Armenia:



8%
# 42





Serbia and Montenegro:



7%
= 43





Azerbaijan:



6%
= 43





Belarus:



6%
= 45





Denmark:



5%
= 45





Latvia:



5%
= 45





Norway:



5%
= 48





Sweden:



4%
= 48





Finland:



4%
= 48





Estonia:



4%
= 48





Iceland:



4%
# 52





Japan:



3%
# 53





Russia:



2%







Weighted average:



26.2%

2009-04-21

FUNDAMENTALISM YET AGAIN


My friend, David Hayward from the Naked Pastor, recently had a bad experience with people's attitudes in their comments concerning the gay issue. He has my sympathy, since - as a general rule - it seems fundamentalism isn't about the exact issue, but more about the need to destroy fellow Christians who do not exactly agree with any given fundamentalist's viewpoints on biblical issues and current ethics. (I must admit, I wish this blog could generate the amount of comments like his site! Lord, forgive my envy ...)

The favourite issues, that get fundamentalistically inclined Christians heated up, seem to be the following:
* Homosexuality
* Gay marriage
* The existence of the devil
* Spiritual warfare
* The inerrancy of Scripture
* The way you read Scripture (is the Bible to be read literally, metaphorically or somewhere in-between?)
* Jesus' virgin birth
* Jonah and the whale (was he inside or on top? - just kidding, of course!)
* Divorce
* Yoga, meditation and contemplative prayer
* Did Jesus rise from the grave or is he still dead (and how do you interpret what the Bible says about this)?
* Extra-marital sex
* The use of drums in the church for worship.

I think this list is very basic. Perhaps I overlooked some of the more important issues in the debate. Still, the common denominator is the fact fundamentalistic people vilify anyone who dare to differ from them, attack their opponents' integrity and salvation, and generally use verbal bullying techniques more appropriate on a fourth grade playground than between adult Christians.

2009-04-20

AFRIKAANS POETRY: Oggendwandeling


OGGENDWANDELING

Die buurt se hondekoor
het van my oggendwandeling gehoor.
Elke dag langs die pad
hoor ek hoe die lede hande vat
om met passie en intonasie
'n geleentheid te maak van die okkasie.
Dis 'n woef en 'n blaf en 'n grom
as ek sweet-sweet om die draai gestap kom.
Ek verluister my soggens keer op keer
hoe die brakkekoor my met hulle lied vereer!

MY CONFESSION

31What, then, shall we say in response to this? If God is for us, who can be against us? 32He who did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all—how will he not also, along with him, graciously give us all things? 33Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? It is God who justifies. 34Who is he that condemns? Christ Jesus, who died—more than that, who was raised to life—is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us. 35Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword? 36As it is written: "For your sake we face death all day long; we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered."37No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Romans 8:31-39

2009-04-17

DEFINING FUNDAMENTALISM

Let me make something clear from the outset of this post: I am not a follower of Dominic Crossan's theology. I differ from him substantially on his view that Jesus didn't rise from the grave. I also disagree with the workings of the Jesus Seminar in their deconstruction of the Gospel. But I sometimes come across useful stuff, even if from someone I disagree with.

Here is a video clip of an interview with mr Crossan, where he provides a definition of literalism and fundamentalism. I can concur with the way he put it. Therefore, let me share the clip with you.

If someone can provide me the link to the whole video recording, I'd really appreciate it.
video

2009-04-13

INVESTIGATIONS INTO NEW AGE PHILOSOPHY

I have recently been accused of supporting new age philosophies. At the time, I decided not to react to the specifics, as the discussion was initiated and conducted through quite an amount of mud slinging. As I am at heart a researcher, I decided to rather look into the latest information on new age philosophy and try to see if what I conveyed during a radio interview indeed could be perceived to be supporting new age influences, and more specifically if today's church is really infiltrated with new age thinking.

RESEARCH METHOD

A simple internet search through Google resulted in 875 million possible sites referring to the words new age. Consequently, to get a grip on the subject seems to be an insurmountably huge effort. It’s made easier by some parameter setting, though. I refrained from reading information presented by fundamentalistic or evangelical Christian sites discussing the subject. These tend to be biased and subjective, presenting their information with the perspective to re-enforce their own belief systems. I also refrained from accessing sites that are kept up by new age practitioners, as these also tend to be subjective and biased – for exactly the same reasons as the fundamentalistically Christian sites. Therefore, I looked into sites who try to present information that allows the reader to gather knowledge without being ambushed by a certain perspective, sites that solely report on the phenomenon, and sites that allow me, for the purposes of this blog post, to get as neutral an opinion about new age philosophy as possible. At the end of the post you’ll find a list of the sites I used to gather the information for this research.

CONFUSION

According to Religioustolerance.org, the New Age Movement is a free-flowing spiritual movement; a network of believers and practitioners who share somewhat similar beliefs and practices, which they add on to whichever formal religion that they follow. Their book publishers take the place of a central organization; seminars, conventions, books and informal groups replace of sermons and religious services.

Wikipedia describes the New Age Movement as a is a decentralized Western social and spiritual movement that seeks "Universal Truth" and the attainment of the highest individual human potential. It combines aspects of cosmology, astrology, esotericism, alternative medicine, music, collectivism, sustainability, and nature. New Age Spirituality is characterized by an individual approach to practices and philosophies, while rejecting religious doctrine and dogma.

The New Age Movement includes elements of older spiritual and religious traditions ranging from atheism and monotheism through classical pantheism, naturalistic pantheism, and panentheism to polytheism combined with science and Gaia philosophy: particularly archaeoastronomy, astronomy, ecology, environmentalism, the Gaia hypothesis, psychology, and physics. New Age practices and philosophies sometimes draw inspiration from major world religions: Buddhism, Chinese folk religion, Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, and Sufism; with particularly strong influences from East Asian religions, Gnosticism, Neopaganism, New Thought, Spiritualism, Theosophy, Universalism, and Western esotericism.

Major confusion about the New Age has been generated by academics, counter-cult groups, Fundamentalist and other Evangelical Christians and traditional Muslim groups. This is primarily due to the diverse origins from which new age philosophy is constructed. Some examples of the confusion are:
  • Many of the above groups have dismissed Sufiism as a New Age cult. In reality, Sufiism has historically been an established mystical movement within Islam, which has always existed in a state of tension with the more legalistic divisions within Islam. It has no connection with New Age.
  • Some conservative Christians believe that a massive, underground, highly coordinated New Age organization exists that is infiltrating government, media, schools and churches. No such entity exists.

BELIEFS


A number of fundamental beliefs are held by many New Age followers; individuals are encouraged to "shop" for the beliefs and practices that they feel most comfortable with:
  • Monism: All that exists is derived from a single source of divine energy.
  • Pantheism: All that exists is God; God is all that exists. This leads naturally to the concept of the divinity of the individual, that we are all Gods. They do not seek God as revealed in a sacred text or as exists in a remote heaven; they seek God within the self and throughout the entire universe.
  • Panentheism: God is all that exists. God is at once the entire universe, and transcends the universe as well.
  • Eclectic spirituality - Every person should follow their own individual path to spirituality instead of dogma. Different religions and philosophies from around the world offer different practices that may be adopted.
  • Spiritual beings - gods, angels, ascended masters, elementals, ghosts, faeries, spirit guides and extraterrestrials can spiritually guide us, if we open ourselves to their guidance.Karma: The good and bad deeds that we do add and subtract from our accumulated record, our karma. At the end of our life, we are rewarded or punished according to our karma by being reincarnated into either a painful or good new life. This belief is linked to that of reincarnation and is derived from Hinduism.
  • An Aura is believed to be an energy field radiated by the body. Invisible to most people, it can be detected by some as a shimmering, multi-colored field surrounding the body. Those skilled in detecting and interpreting auras can diagnose an individual's state of mind, and their spiritual and physical health.
  • Forces - It is commonly held that there exist certain forces, which are independent of spiritual beings or agencies and distinct from forces defined by science, such as gravitation and electromagnetism. These forces are elemental in nature and operate in an automatic manner as part of the natural order; they cause seeds to sprout, grow, and bloom, etc.
  • Power - The forces, and everything else, are energized by a mystical power that exists in varying degrees in all things. Power is transferable, through physical contact, sensory perception, or mere proximity. Power may be accumulated or depleted in a person or object through a variety of mechanisms, including fate and esoteric practices. This power is held to be physically observable as an aura or subtle body and psi energy; and when encountered in great concentration, may even be dangerous.
  • Energy - In some belief systems, forces and power may seem to merge, e.g., in the concept of vital force that exists in many traditional belief systems, and finds its expression in New Age concepts such as the energies in Therapeutic Touch or Reiki and ideas of flowing streams of power in the Earth, like ley lines in Britain and Europe and Earth energies addressed in the Chinese geomantic system of feng shui.
  • Spirit - All beings (particularly sentient beings) are accompanied by a specific, intentional energy which corresponds to their consciousness, but is in some way independent of their corporeal existence. This energy typically is more primary than the physical entity, in the sense that it remains in some form after the physical death.
  • Teleology - Life has a purpose; this includes a belief in synchronicity—that coincidences have spiritual meaning and lessons to teach those whom are open to them. Everything is universally connected through God and participates in the same energy. There is a cosmic goal and a belief that all entities are (knowingly or unknowingly) cooperating towards this goal.
  • Interpersonal relationships - There are opportunities to learn about one's self and relationships are destined to be repeated until they are healthy.
  • Intuition - An important aspect of perception, which has been offset by a somewhat strict rationalism, noted specially in the works of proeminent psychologist Jung.
  • Optimism - Positive thinking supported by affirmations will achieve success in anything This is based on the concept that Thought Creates. Therefore, as one begins focusing attention and consciousness on the positive, on the "half-filled" glass of water, reality starts shifting and materializing the positive intentions and aspects of life. A certain critical mass of people with a highly spiritual consciousness will bring about a sudden change in the whole population. Humans have a responsibility to take part in positive creative activity and to work to heal ourselves, each other and the planet.
  • Personal Transformation A profoundly intense mystical experience will lead to the acceptance and use of New Age beliefs and practices. Guided imagery, hypnosis, meditation, and (sometimes) the use of hallucinogenic drugs are useful to bring about and enhance this transformation. Believers hope to develop new potentials within them: the ability to heal oneself and others, psychic powers, a new understanding of the workings of the universe, etc. Later, when sufficient numbers of people have achieved these powers, a major spiritual, physical, psychological and cultural planet-wide transformation is expected.
  • Ecological Responsibility: A belief in the importance of uniting to preserve the health of the earth, which is often looked upon as Gaia, (Mother Earth) a living entity.
  • Universal Religion: Since all is God, then only one reality exists, and all religions are simply different paths to that ultimate reality. The universal religion can be visualized as a mountain, with many sadhanas (spiritual paths) to the summit. Some are hard; others easy. There is no one correct path. All paths eventually reach the top. They anticipate that a new universal religion which contains elements of all current faiths will evolve and become generally accepted worldwide. According to Wikipedia Meditation, Yoga, Tantra, Chinese medicine, Ayurveda, martial arts, Tai chi chuan, Falun Gong, Qigong, Reflexology, Reiki, and other eastern practices can assist in realizing one’s potential.
  • New World Order: As the Age of Aquarius unfolds, a New Age will develop. This will be a utopia in which there is world government, an end to war, disease, hunger, pollution, and poverty. Gender, racial, religious and other forms of discrimination will cease. People's allegiance to their tribe or nation will be replaced by a concern for the entire world and its people.

The Age of Aquarius is a reference to the procession of the zodiac. The earth passes into a new sign of the zodiac approximately every 2,000 years. Some believe that the earth entered the constellation of Aquarius at the end of the 20th century.

PRACTICES

Many practices are found among New Agers. A typical practitioner is active in only a few areas:
  • Channeling A method similar to that used by Spiritists in which a spirit of a long dead individual is conjured up. However, while Spiritists generally believe that one's soul remains relatively unchanged after death, most channelers believe that the soul evolves to higher planes of existence. Chanelers usually try to make contact with a single, spiritually evolved being. That being's consciousness is channeled through the medium and relays guidance and information to the group, through the use of the medium's voice. Channeling has existed since the 1850's and many groups consider themselves independent of the New Age movement.
  • Crystals Crystals are materials which have their molecules arranged in a specific, highly ordered internal pattern. This pattern is reflected in the crystal's external structure which typically has symmetrical planar surfaces. Many common substances, from salt to sugar, from diamonds to quartz form crystals. They can be shaped so that they will vibrate at a specific frequency and are widely used in radio communications and computing devices. New Agers believe that crystals possess healing energy.
  • Meditating A process of blanking out the mind and releasing oneself from conscious thinking. This is often aided by repetitive chanting of a mantra, or focusing on an object.
  • New Age Music A gentle, melodic, inspirational music form involving the human voice, harp, lute, flute, etc. It is used as an aid in healing, massage therapy and general relaxation.
  • Divination The use of various techniques to foretell the future, including I Ching, Pendulum movements, Runes, Scrying, Tarot Cards.
  • Astrology The belief that the orientation of the planets at the time of one's birth, and the location of that birth predicts the individual's future and personality. Belief in astrology is common amongst New Agers, but definitely not limited to them.
  • Holistic Health This is a collection of healing techniques which have diverged from the traditional medical model. It attempts to cure disorders in mind, body and spirit and to promote wholeness and balance in the individual. Examples are acupuncture, crystal healing, homeopathy, iridology, massage, various meditation methods, polarity therapy, psychic healing, therapeutic touch, reflexology, etc.
  • Human Potential Movement (a.k.a. Emotional Growth Movement) This is a collection of therapeutic methods involving both individualized and group working, using both mental and physical techniques. The goal is to help individuals to advance spiritually. Examples are Esalen Growth Center programs, EST, Gestalt Therapy, Primal Scream Therapy, Transactional Analysis, Transcendental Meditation and Yoga.

EVALUATION

When attempting an evaluation of new age philosophy, one should remember that a subject as vast as this cannot be done justice by a few thoughts in a blogpost. The purpose, therefore, is to establish one’s personal opinion on the subject at hand. For me the question at hand is whether new age philosophy really has crept into contemporary theological thinking.

Let me establish a few ground rules. According to 1 Corinthians 10:23-11:1 the principle is established that a Christian has freedom in decisions purporting to lifestyle choices that has its origins in another religion. Where the context in the abovementioned paragraph is the eating of meat that was sold in a butchery connected to ancient idol worship, the ongoing principle is that Christians have freedom of conscience to live life freely. That implies that practices, such as sports previously associated with specific religions – for example karate – can be participated in without fear.

Paul established a second principle in this paragraph. He referred to another Christian for whom participation in such activities can become a stumbling block. In the original context, it meant that new believers from pagan religions can be “seduced” to re-participate in the religious rituals associated with the buying of meat in these butcheries. The ongoing principle is that today one should refrain from practices that can lead other Christians into tempation – for example one should refrain from drinking alcohol when in the company of a rehabilitated alcoholic. For Paul, the underlying principle is the fact that the Christian faith brings freedom in Christ. This freedom also frees the believers from the enslavement of legalism and fear of practices that will lead one unknowingly into sin – or back into another faith system. When discussing new age philosophy, therefore, I am free to investigate the appropriateness of nonreligious practices that could have its origin in cultures where it was associated with particular faith systems. If it comes to my knowledge that this could lead another Christian into temptation to actually participate in the religious practices, according to Paul, I am challenged to voluntarily refrain from this for the sake of my brother's/sister's conscience.

This is why a Christian could, in principle, have the freedom to participate in eastern sport such as tae kwon do, karate or judo, provided the instructor only teaches the sport and not any form of eastern philosophy along with the sport. And since this is a point of contention for more convservative Christians, a Christian could also participate in meditation techniques that enable him/her to relax and get focused on worship or studying Scripture, provided this isn’t part of practices that is closely associated with eastern religions. Obviously, it makes sense to argue that participating in new age practices such as astrology or spiritism falls outside the scope of this principle, as these practices are also closely associated with the occult.

A second ground rule. Some of the beliefs and practices associated with new age philosophy actually isn’t reserved for this belief system alone. Take the following, using the above discussed beliefs as comparison:
  • Christians also believe in the existence of spiritual beings, specifically angels and demons – as it is taught about in the Bible. The difference here is that Christians don’t turn to angels for guidance but rather trust on the Lord alone.
  • The principle of teleology, or the view that life has a purpose, is also shared by Christians. The difference is that Christians do not believe in the participation of God’s energy, as we beleive our life has purpose because we share in the mission of God to redeem this fallen world.
  • The Bible is filled with references to the importance of interpersonal relationships. No less than 96 “one another” texts exist in the New Testament. The culture of the ancient Near East is steeped in relationship, with the household, or family relationship, as the first and primary relationship. The difference is that these relational character is geared towards Christians code of public conduct, and aimed at testifying about God rather than being destined to be repeated until it becomes healthy.
  • Christians also share the belief in optimism; we only call it hope, where our hope lies in Christ and His ongoing redemption of this world.
  • As it was written by Paul in Romans 12:1-2, Christians adhere to the belief of personal transformation. Where new age philosophy tries to achieve this transformation through mystical experience, Christians typically submit their thought patterns and character formation to become mirror images of the teachings of Jesus, focusing on God’s leading through his Word in stead of getting supernatural power to develop new potentials within them, as is believed by new age philosophy.
  • In accordance with the principle established in Genesis 1, that we were made to look after the earth, Christians also share the view that an ecological responsibility exists. The difference is that we do it because we understand ourselves to be caretakers of God’s creation and not because we are in union with mother earth.
  • Finally, Christianity believes, as it is said by Jesus Himself, that a new kingdom is breakling through in this world, the kingdom of God. We are threfore harbringers of the new world order of God’s reign on earth – or as Ephesians 1 says, God is busy uniting everything in heaven and on earth under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.

A final ground rule: When somebody accuses a fellow Christian of sporting new age thought, my initial reaction is to look into the context: Does the rest of this person’s arguments, or what he/she was busy saying or writing, reflect an intentional effort to promote new age philosophy as part of Christian religious thinking? Does this person’s life testify towards an obsession with new age practices or thinking? Has this person departed from orthodox Christianity?

For example, Ron Martoia wrote in his blog that he started doing yoga. That can get a few eyebrows rising, as the practice of yoga and eastern religion is closely associated with each other. But ... Martoia continued saying that practicing yoga doesn’t mean you practice Buddhism. When reading through Martoia’s books, you also find he is quite orthodox in his theology, even if he asks alternative theological questions about sin and helping people to meet Christ. Thus, his own testimony shows he isn’t subversively trying to promote new age or Buddhist philosophy and luring other Christians into some sort of occult trap.

I do not practice yoga or forms of centering prayer myself, as my own spirituality more associates with worship music and Scripture study. I am personally also somewhat sceptical about doing stuff that has the baggage of other religions, such as yoga. But I do not think one will be caught in some demonic trap when you do yoga exercises for relaxation or when you practice centering your prayer. And I do not think fellow Christians who do yoga to relax and meditate to focus on God is diluting their Christianity with new age philosophy.

Furthermore, as a final evaluation of new age philosophy, I will definitely not be looking over the shoulder of every Christian writer or leader or group to see whether they are participating in some subversive covert conspiracy to lure innocent believers into something other than what the Bible teaches. The difference between biblical teaching and new age philosophy is,after all, way too pronounced and obvious for that.

To answer my initial question - is contemporary Christianity infiltrated by new age thought - I think the abovementioned principles with which one should look at books, speeches, sermons, interviews radio programmes, etc, as well as the broad outline of what new agers think, believe and do, will sufficiently enable any Christian to discern for themselves if they will believe what is said or written, whether it is new age or whether the criticism brought in against Christian leaders is justified.

REFERENCES

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Age

http://www.religioustolerance.org/newage.htm

http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/2001/06/What-New-Agers-Believe.aspx

http://www.sullivan-county.com/nf0/nov_2000/new_age_rel.htm

2009-04-10

AN EXCURSION ON GOOD FRIDAY


One of my best friends, Mariëtte van den Bovenkamp, works for an organization called "Straatwerk" (lit. street work). She is sort of the social worker at their Coffee Room in the city centre of Cape Town. Straatwerk yearly has an outreach over Christmas as well as Easter Weekend. In conjunction with their ongoing projects - project clean-up - volunteers can go and help with cleaning up Cape Town City's streets. They also give food packets to the homeless and on Good Friday they hand out easter eggs with stickers - Jesus Saves - printed on one side. Then, in the evening they reach out to the night people, the men and women hanging out at the night clubs in the city and the prostitutes doing business in Green Point. Mariëtte and her family was directly involved with Good Friday's handing out of easter eggs, and Cindy, the boys and I decided to go along.

Cramped in a small street front shop, the two rooms of the Coffee Shop is situated just off Adderly Street. It is temporary and Mariëtte tells me they are praying for more suitable premises. We got there early, as we were afraid we wouldn't be getting suitable parking. As it happened, I got parking right around the corner in Adderly Street. So we entered an almost empty room and waited.

Soon, however, the room filled up with people. Mostly, it was people from the street. Some 49 volunteers also joined and quickly the place became crowded and admittedly smelly. Some of the people really looked like they live on the street. The local lingo refers to them as "Bergies" - or mounties, a reference to the fact that Table Mountain towers above the city's inhabitants, especially those sleeping on the street. A few clearly had dignity, dressing neatly and taking care of themselves.

The morning started with a volunteer playing the guitar and leading the group in well-known worship songs. Everyone joined in and it was clear that these people really liked singing. Then the leader of Straatwerk, rev Fourie Truter, took the floor and started explaining how the service will proceed. He shared a short message about Easter with us all. I liked the part where he shared that Jesus' love was for all people and not just some, after quoting John 3:16.

Then he asked for the volunteer to team up with someone and pray for them. The people who wanted to be prayed for had to raise their hands. I sat just beside a lady called Irene who raised her hand. I must admit, I cannot pronounce her surname, but it is definitely South African. Being the closest to her, I turned and asked what we could pray for. She said she had pains all over her body and asked that I pray for healing. I almost smiled. For me, as reformed minister, it's like asking a charismatic pastor to baptise a baby. But I gently touched her arm and silently asked the Lord to lead my prayer. I eventually did pray for her healing.

When these prayers seized, Fourie asked for a volunteer to lead in prayer. A gentleman on the other side of the room, with an accent, got up and started praying. He thanked the Lord for Fourie's message; he also rephrased the message in his own words, elaborated on his foreignness (said he is an immigrant). Then he prayed for the country, for the people who focused on cars and money and big houses and that this is not what faith is all about. The first time he said people who focus on cars, I heard an awful swear word, and thought perhaps where he came from it is a usual word to pray with. Afterwards Mariëtte, Dirk-Jan (her husband) and Cindy also said they thought he used this particular swear word! Luckily we all got corrected when he repeated this strange pronounciation of focus a few times. It was quite funny, however, to hear us all admit our sort-of sinfulness.

The guitarist led us in one final song, Amazing Grace, and I heard Irene singing along with the most beautifully clear voice. It was appropriate to compliment her on that - and I actually felt compelled to share my thought with her. She reacted with the most spontaneous of smiles I saw in quite a time.

The children who were present were asked to share the food packages and so my sons got up, wandered in between the street people and promptly handed out packages with hot cross buns, easter eggs and small crosses as reminder of Christ's love.

Then we, the volunteers, got moved to the adjacent room and received our instructions. We were equipped with bright yellow pull-overs declaring our participation in the project, sacks of easter eggs, and plastic bags for the clean-up operation (we were to pick up waste paper and stuff). We were grouped into teams and sent off.

At first, it was strange. How do you approach a complete stranger? What do you say? Even though I was supposed to be used to be speaking to strangers, I still wondered how it would work out. Luckily my boys are very outgoing. They grabbed handsful of easter eggs and started stuffing it into every and any passerby's hands. Soon we got them to say "Happy Easter" as well. It was amazing to see complete strangers' reaction to four primary school kids with oversized yellow pull-overs handing out eggs, yelling over the length of St George's Mall "Happy Easter!" Within minutes, the eggs were handed out. We got into the business of cleaning up the waste. It was fun. The journey took us almost one and a half hours, up and down St George's Mall. Near the end the children started complaining they were thirsty, so we ended our excursion with a milk shake at a sidewalk cafe.


When we returned to the Coffee Room, we got into debriefing with the other volunteers. Some of them had amazing stories to tell. It seems our group was the only group to just hand out eggs, as all the others told of their conversations with people. One person recounted his chat with an artist who committed his life to Jesus. Another one was challenged with the accusation that all Christians are hypocrites, all professing their salvation but living quite a different life. Some were rejected outright, even though they didn't try to engage in conversation. One lady got surrounded by a group who tried to steal her camera.

My final impression? Even though one can be sceptical about the effectiveness of such an outreach, I am strengthened in my own faith, as I was part of an effort to unconditionally share the love of Christ with people. I don't think my participation actually changed someone's life, but to have involved my sons and Cindy in an outreach effort of this sort, to have given love and acceptance to people living in total destitution - even if it was only praying for Irene's body aches - to walk up and down a street and picking up garbage, and to see strangers smile as young people present them with a small token of easter, made it all worth the while.

2009-04-07

THE ONGOING DISCUSSION WITH TOM LESSING

Dear Tom

It is against my better judgment that I engage in this correspondence with you. I am afraid that you will take what I write and strip it of its original context and use the quote as if itself was what I meant to say. This being said, I want to put a few things into perspective about the ongoing discussions on our different weblogs (your part of the discussion can be accessed here):

* First of all, a mere technicality: You used a photograph of me without permission. Please refrain from doing so and be so kind and remove the photo. It was posted on websites that allow me to use my own photos while accepting the responsibility of copyright protecting it on my behalf. We all tend to right click and save pictures from the internet, without taking the time to read the copyright stipulations. It is actually quite unethical.

* I am not a follower of Stephan Joubert's thoughts. I came to my own conclusions by theological study and personal reflection and an ongoing investigation of the Bible. For the record, conclusions I made in 1997 during postgraduate studies regarding the need for a new evangelistic approach and ecclesiology (or teaching about the nature of the church), was afterward also reflected by pastors and ministers in what eventually came to be known as the emerging church. Stephan was not my promotor for this study. We are, however, good friends, and I trust his integrity and judgment. When he attests to somebody else's authenticity, such as what he said about Rob Bell (and that I referred to during the radio programme), I have enough trust in his opinion and integrity to accept it at face value. By the way, I will correct the typo in my previous blogpost on Rob Bell. It was unintentional.

* I deliberately refrain from using Scripture references when I write to you. The Bible is not intended to be a proof text for one's arguments. The Bible is also not intended to be used as a legalistic document viewed as containing only universal laws to be abided. The Bible is God's Word, through the testimonies of the faithful believers who wrote it down. Furthermore, the Bible writers never used chapters and verses. It was included into the Biblical text to allow for easier reference, somewhere in the earlier period of church history (300-1000 AD). Biblical texts should actually be read as a whole, with regard to a text's specific style of writing (a psalm is read differently as a gospel, for example). I will thus not be falling in the trap of trying to proof-text any theological arguments from the Bible.

* It never was my intention to attack you personally. When I sent out my text message on Twitter, and placing my previous post on my weblog, I wanted to share my thoughts with my network of friends only. Perhaps I should adjust the settings on my twitter account so that my sms's will be restricted to my friends alone. When I grouped you with Sarel vd Merwe, I did it on the basis of your own weblog serving as a mouth piece to his conferences and workshops. You yourself made the association as being one of his grouping of followers. And with followers I mean it in the broadest sense - the agenda you are pursuing is made up by people following it, like yourself and Sarel.

* My use of the metaphor of being declared the enemy of the state, stems from the fact that Sarel devoted a whole afternoon session of his February conference to pastors and ministers being misled by the Emerging Church Movement (as you yourself reported on your blog). Your approach reflects the viewpoint, "if you're not with us, you are against us." I also personally spoke to several ministers of the Dutch Reformed Church, all over the country, who attest to the fact that he does indeed keep a list of some sorts of pastors which he deems dangerous to his idea of biblical truth. It just makes sense to generalise this subversive way of operating by speaking of it as a black list.

* It seems that your underlying issue is with the New Age Movement. You force remarks from leaders in the Dutch Reformed Church, as well as people associated with the emerging church movement, into a common denominator, by declaring them all to be New Age adherents or worse. There is a saying that goes something like this: If you look for the devil behind every bush, all you will eventually see is the devil. In this process you and Sarel van der Merwe take remarks from its intended context and meaning; you intentionally attack and belittle the integrity of people who sincerely love and serve Jesus Christ; you spread malicious half-truths to the people who read your blog or attend your workshops; you intimidate ministers of religion and other Christian leaders by trying to hijack every meeting where your favourite subject is being discussed or your current enemies are involved. In all this you forget the overarching principle of Christ's love as the ultimate driving force in Christian dealings. My actual problem is that you consequently accuse everybody associated with the Emerging Church Movement of being deluded by New Age Philosophy, but nowhere do you provide substance to your accusations (i.e. you do not explain why it is new age or how any reasonable reader or listener will be induced into new age philosophy by listening or reading it). You also expect your readers/listeners to know what the true gospel is that you so vociferously defend without putting it forth as alternative to that with which you differ. All I read is biblical verses that you use as support for your own arguments. Please, help me here, what exactly should we preach, in your opinion? Perhaps you could devote a blog post to elaborating on your beliefs and theology? It should be a recurring thing, however, because from time to time newer readers should be able to understand why you think the way you do.

* My final remark - and this will be the last time I will be participating in a discussion with you about this subject - is the following: I am concerned about your absolute legalistic approach to the Christian faith. You use a yard stick of right and wrong, abusing the Bible, to fit your interpretation and view point of what should be right or wrong. You do not acknowledge for a single moment your own shortcomings in the way you interpret Scripture, expecting from your readers to accept your interpretation as the one and only single possible reading. From this viewpoint you spend all your time and energy attacking Christian leaders and pastors and thinkers - people who mostly stood up to the challenge of communicating Jesus' redemption to a group of people who cannot be reached by your way of evangelism or your black-and-white theology anymore. You use a tactic of divide and intimidate and the spreading of slanderous comments about the integrity of people you disagree with under the guise of protecting the faith. In the mean time you have become an agent of the devil himself. When I read the Bible I see that Jesus reserved his most scathing criticism for the Pharisees and rabbis of his time, people who used the Old Testament in exactly the same legalistic way you are doing today with the whole Bible. In stead of attacking Christians who are trying to bring the gospel of Jesus Christ to a increasingly broken generation, why don't you start spending your considerable energy and knowledge to find ways to help broken, lost and destitute seekers see the light of God's presence, and the love of Jesus, without judging them?

Thank you for this brief opportunity to engage in discussion with you. I trust you will see I have no intention of degrading your person or your passion. Neither is my intention to try and convince you to my viewpoint. I only ask that you respectfully accept my views in the same way I do yours, even though I fundamentally differ from them. I am, after all, also a brother in Christ, having given my life to the Lordship of Jesus Christ and serving Him and Him alone.

I will follow your blog with interest from here on, for I am convinced that God will expose the hidden agendas that drive this mission of yours to attack the church.


Sincerely
Guillaume Smit

I HAVE BECOME AN ENEMY OF THE STATE

I received an email this morning, from a gentleman called Tom Lessing, who researches New Age trends while exposing it's heretical influence in contemporary theology. He and his grouping are dead set against the Emerging Church Movement. He reacted to my participation in a Radio Pulpit radio programme on the emerging church, posting an entry on his blog. Unfortunately, it was written in Afrikaans (for those of you who don't understand Afrikaans).

He is rather scathing in his attack. I feel quite privileged, however, as he uses my name in the same sentence as Stephan Joubert, Nelus Niemandt, and Jannie Pelser. Didn't think I am that important!

You can read his entry about our radio programme here: http://1joh4.wordpress.com.

2009-04-05

DOES ROB BELL TEACH YOGA?

Recently I was invited to participate in a radio programme on a local radio station (Radio Pulpit). The topic of the interview was "What is The Emerging Church?" I was invited beacuse of the much discussed article about the ECM I wrote, and was published in our denomination's official newspaper - Kerkbode. The other participants of the programme were Cobus van Wyngaard, a vocal participant in a local chapter of the ECM in Pretoria, and Sarel van der Merwe, who developed and presented a workshop on the dangers of the Emerging Church Movement in February.

During the course of the interview (I requested a mp3-copy of the programme from Radio Pulpit, and when I received it, I will post in on the blog - unfortunately it will be in Afrikaans; perhaps I'll venture a translated transcript if time permits me), Sarel vd Merwe accused some of the leading thinkers in the ECM of heresy, specifically referring to Rob Bell teaching his congregation members to do yoga. I remember thinking how one can respond to such a blanket accusation, when it is stated as fact with no further elaboration. My response during the radio programme was to plead for a relational approach - by connecting to the person being accused on a more personal level, and understaning his or her motives. One of my old university lecturers, Stephan Joubert, shared with me that he personally knows Rob and can testify to his love and commitment to Jesus Christ.

After the interview I started thinking. It led to an internet search with the question, "Does Rob Bell teach Yoga?" The results that came up was a mixture of yoga-related sites, websites referring to Rob's ministry thrtough his Nooma-DVD's and a bunch of sites devoted to criticism of the ECM. During the course of the search I got hold of Rob's DVD titled Breathe and watched it. Very interesting. No mention of yoga, though.

The sites devoted to warn against the ECM are very outspoken about their dislike of the emerging church, and even Rob Bell. Luckily, one of them (I can't remember which one, as I didn't bookmark it) posted a sermon by Rob - preached on 29 May 2005, entitled breathe. I downloaded the sermon and listened to it. He referred to yoga. It was part of an illustration on helping the congregants understand the biblical meaning of spirit, and the Holy Spirit, and His role in our Christian lives. Rob connected it to the fact that we need breathing to live. He then referred to the yoga practice of keeping your breathing steady when you learn to relax. This was followed, as part of the illustration, to enable the people in the service (as I understand it) to put their own thoughts regarding to stuff that they need to unload before God's feet, in perspective.

To a more conservative Christian I can imagine Rob's technique to be way strange. The whole service and his use of theology is very creative and interactive. Rob uses a simple technique of involving his audience in the subject matter by letting them write their thoughts on what he's saying - reflecting on their own experience - on a piece of paper. His use of Scripture is very diverse and he utilises a method of theologizing by drawing together exegetical concepts such as spirit, earth, breath and dependance on God.

I really cannot see how anyone could think he is teaching yoga to his church, through this sermon, unless you are charismatically inclined and believe the devil uses subversive methods like sneeking into your soul through opened gateways (such as participating in a yoga-type illustration). To accuse Rob of promoting yoga is simply distorting the context of the illustration. To be honest, I'd be much more at ease if he rather referred to the earlier church fathers who practices solitude and the monastic version of contemplative prayer for this illustration.

But as I'm not a member of his community I'm not privy to the subcultures prevalent in Mars Hill. Maybe yoga is practiced by a lot of his church members as part of their daily exercise routine. After all, yoga, as with karate and judo and other martial arts sports, can be practiced without getting involved in eastern religions or eastern philosophy. But ... let me not be the one to influence your opinion. Here, then, is Rob's Nooma-clip called BREATHE:


video

Unfortunately, Blogger doesn't allow me to upload the mp3 of Rob's sermon, as it is too long. I can try and email it to you, if you want to listen to it.


2009-04-02

Quotable comments: HOW DO YOU VIEW SIN?

Ron Martoia is challenging me in fresh, new ways I didn't think could be possible. His book, Transformational Architecture, is dealing with the issue of sin and redemption, among others - an issue I am also grappling with as part of my own theological growth process. Listen to this profound insight of his:

"When sin is viewed as an infraction, as it is in the Western Protestant tradition, we can be led to believe that once the legal transaction is taken care of, things are fine. And in a legal setting, where infraction is breaking the law, that is a fine metaphor. But sin is more than a legal issue. This is what we see in the garden [of Eden] when Adam and Eve run and hide from God. They have been infected with a sense of shame, and shame is not dominantly a legal condition but a relational one. Something happened inside themselves, between themselves, and between them and God."


(p. 133)

DO YOU ALSO FEEL THIS WAY?


Thanks again to David Hayward, The Naked Pastor, for this piece of very good theological insight.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails